not to pull an “i told you so” but if there’s one theme that imo you should come out of the hamsteak epilogues thinking and asking yourself questions about it’s the value of of the assigned sanctity of “canonicity” with regards to fanwork and how you engage with media
like, i guess to put up a personal example, there are a handful of fire emblem ships that i like that have totally awful support chains, for whatever various reasons. i don’t like these ships for their Officially Sanctioned Canon interactions, but rather the potential of these characters’ personalities and experiences have with each other. i’m allowed to create these alternate interactions outside of canon and that’s like, an okay thing to do
cocoa-nuts liked this
chchgf liked this
5kmoe said: also life is like this irl
redventure liked this
realnerolyk liked this
negatistic-nocturnities liked this
robindaydream liked this
iturbide liked this
homoshy liked this bleflat liked this
lamphoera said: @sixthousandbees YEAH tbh, like, mostly i just feel thinking about like how it’s reasonable to be upset about like, jane and dirk, but also how the narrative goes out of its way to remind us that these aren’t the only possible versions of them out there. like saying something like “jane is canonically racist” is, while humorous, pretty reductive of like, Jane As A Character outside of the specific context That Jane was placed in, and the same goes for all the others
sixthousandbees said: that seemed like the hardest point they were trying to make, what with the WHOLE EPILOGUE being inside an AO3 clone, and the fight for control of the narrative. “The death of the author” literally occurred within the comic.
rarityismywaifu liked this i mean, questions like “what is the essence of a character” don’t have a right answer, but the purpose of the question...
